All Different Ways You Can Style a ‘Classic White Shirt’
August 22, 2023
No Comments
In corporate corridors, courtrooms, creative studios, hospitals, startups, and boardrooms across Sri Lanka and beyond, a certain type of woman is quietly praised.
She is “low maintenance.”
She doesn’t complain.
She doesn’t demand.
She doesn’t need reassurance.
She doesn’t ask for too much.
She handles pressure.
She adapts.
She absorbs.
She is easy to work with.
Easy to love.
Easy to overlook.
What sounds like a compliment is often a conditioning mechanism. And over time, this identity does not empower women. It erodes them.
For high-performing, career-driven women especially, the pressure to appear emotionally undemanding becomes a professional strategy. But that strategy carries hidden costs: burnout, resentment, misalignment, emotional fatigue, stalled promotions, relationship dissatisfaction, and identity fragmentation.
This is not about becoming difficult.
It is about recognising that “low maintenance” is often code for emotional self-suppression.
And suppression, sustained long enough, breaks even the most resilient women.
Read our recent article here “Visibility Is Harder Than Talent Here’s Why”
From adolescence, many women are subtly rewarded for being accommodating. In family systems, educational settings, and professional environments, the agreeable woman is often positioned as mature, composed, and strong.
But psychological research on emotional labour and people-pleasing tendencies shows something more complex: when women repeatedly deprioritise their own needs to maintain harmony, they internalise a belief that their requirements are excessive.
This belief becomes behavioural.
They hesitate before asking for a raise.
They downplay workload stress.
They accept unequal emotional responsibility in relationships.
They tolerate unclear expectations.
They over-function in teams.
On the surface, this looks like resilience. In reality, it is chronic self-minimisation.
Over time, the nervous system pays the price. Emotional regulation becomes harder. Micro-resentments accumulate. Boundaries blur. Self-worth becomes externally validated by how little space one takes up.
And the professional consequences are measurable.
In competitive professional environments, being “easy” can initially feel strategic.
Managers prefer team members who do not escalate conflict.
Partners prefer colleagues who do not question structure.
Clients prefer consultants who absorb friction quietly.
But here is the professional paradox:
Women who do not articulate needs are often passed over for leadership.
Leadership requires visible self-advocacy, strategic boundary-setting, and calibrated assertiveness. When a woman consistently absorbs pressure without signalling capacity thresholds, she becomes operationally reliable but strategically invisible.
In industries such as law, finance, media, healthcare, entrepreneurship, and corporate leadership, career progression depends not just on competence, but on presence.
Presence requires voice.
And voice requires the willingness to risk being seen as “high maintenance.”
Sociologists have long studied emotional labour the invisible effort involved in managing feelings to meet external expectations. Women disproportionately carry this load in both personal and professional spheres.
In the workplace, this looks like:
• Managing team morale
• Softening communication
• Mediating conflicts
• Anticipating emotional reactions
• Taking on coordination roles without title upgrades
In relationships, it looks like:
• Remembering dates
• Monitoring emotional climate
• Initiating difficult conversations
• Adjusting tone to avoid escalation
• Carrying the mental load of logistics
A woman who prides herself on being low maintenance often becomes the default emotional stabiliser.
The cost is cumulative cognitive fatigue.
High-achieving women already operate in performance-driven ecosystems. Adding invisible emotional labour without reciprocal support leads to depletion masked as strength.
One of the most damaging effects of the “low maintenance” identity is internal fragmentation.
Professionally, many women cultivate executive presence, negotiation skills, strategic thinking, and analytical clarity.
Privately, they shrink.
They tolerate emotional unavailability.
They minimise dissatisfaction.
They avoid asking for reciprocity.
They silence ambition to avoid threatening dynamics.
This split identity creates cognitive dissonance.
How can a woman argue a constitutional case, close a multimillion-rupee deal, run a company, or lead a board meeting and yet feel uncomfortable expressing basic relational needs?
Because she was rewarded for being undemanding.
But long-term emotional suppression creates stress patterns that mirror burnout.
Burnout is often framed as an occupational hazard. But for many professional women, it is relational.
When a woman is emotionally low maintenance, she becomes the default strong one.
The partner who “doesn’t need much.”
The colleague who “handles it.”
The daughter who “understands.”
The leader who “won’t crack.”
Over time, this identity eliminates space for vulnerability.
Research in occupational psychology shows that chronic emotional suppression correlates with increased cortisol levels, sleep disruption, irritability, and decreased job satisfaction. What appears to be calm competence externally may internally be chronic dysregulation.
Professional performance eventually declines not because of incompetence, but because of exhaustion.
High-performing women often derive pride from resilience.
They survived competitive education systems.
They built careers in male-dominated sectors.
They navigated economic volatility.
They supported families.
Resilience becomes identity.
But resilience without boundaries becomes self-sacrifice.
Many women fear that asking for more more clarity, more support, more emotional responsiveness, more recognition, more pay, more partnership will label them as difficult.
Yet data across leadership research consistently shows that women who practise assertive communication and structured boundary-setting are more likely to be perceived as competent leaders when done strategically.
The shift is not from low maintenance to high drama.
It is from silent endurance to calibrated expression.
When women minimise their needs, the economic impact compounds.
They negotiate less aggressively.
They accept delayed promotions.
They hesitate to pitch bold ideas.
They underprice services.
They avoid confrontation in partnerships.
This creates long-term financial disparity.
In entrepreneurial ecosystems, founders who avoid strategic conflict often under-scale. In corporate hierarchies, employees who do not advocate for advancement remain in operational roles longer.
Being low maintenance may preserve short-term harmony. It often sacrifices long-term leverage.
In intimate partnerships, the low maintenance woman is initially celebrated.
She is independent.
Self-sufficient.
Low conflict.
“Chill.”
But intimacy requires reciprocity.
If one partner consistently absorbs, adjusts, and minimises, imbalance forms.
Over time, quiet resentment replaces admiration.
Professional women, especially those managing demanding careers, need emotional steadiness not performance approval.
Emotional availability is not high maintenance. It is foundational infrastructure.
When women suppress needs to avoid friction, they often attract partners or colleagues who under-invest.
The system stabilises around their silence.
True strength in modern professional ecosystems is not silent endurance. It is regulated expression.
It is saying:
“I need clarity on this role.”
“I require support to meet this deadline.”
“This dynamic is not sustainable.”
“My contribution warrants compensation adjustment.”
“I value emotional responsiveness.”
This is not fragility.
It is executive functioning applied to self-advocacy.
Women who move from low maintenance to self-respecting recalibrate their personal and professional ecosystems.
And while there may be short-term discomfort, long-term alignment improves.
The shift requires skill.
This is systems recalibration, not personality change.
In a world that celebrates self-sacrifice in women and ambition in men, the “low maintenance” identity feels safe.
But safety is not the same as sustainability.
High-achieving women are re-evaluating what strength truly means. They are recognising that emotional self-abandonment is not maturity. It is conditioning.
Being self-sufficient does not mean being unsupported.
Being independent does not mean being unheard.
Being resilient does not mean being silent.
Professional success without emotional alignment creates hollow achievement.
The women who thrive long term are not the ones who need nothing.
They are the ones who articulate what sustains them.
And that articulation is not high maintenance.
It is self-respect.
If this resonated, explore more insights on professional identity, emotional intelligence, leadership boundaries, and sustainable success inside Satyn Circle where ambitious women learn to build careers and relationships that do not require self-erasure.
Because strength should expand you not shrink you.
SatynMag empowers women with inspiring stories, expert advice, and uplifting content to fuel their strength and dreams
Welcome to Satynmag S Suite, online knowledge platform for career and personal growth. This is where you can empower yourself with cutting edge knowledge, latest know-how and grow.
